Friday 9 September 2022

Bringing the beige

My mother is from New Zealand, my father is Samoan. My brother is brown like my father, I have freckles like my mother. My brother carries tau lima both traditional and western. I have none. As children, I had the red curled cap of a recessive English-Stowers gene, while my brother’s hair was straight, black silk like our Saina-Samoan aiga.

Before I was 5 years old, we had lived in New Zealand, Australia and Papua New Guinea- where cocoa-coloured children found my red hair an oddity, and trailed me in giggling packs to touch it.

In Australian schools, my classmates and their parents were Thursday Islanders, Fijians, Maltese, Italian, Czech, English, Papuans, Aboriginal. Voluntary and involuntary Australians, descendents of the land, blackbirders and blackbirds, colonisers and colonised, deportees, and refugees.

My family was unusual in our mobility- my father’s 4th nation at age 25, and my mother’s 3rd- but in many ways, we illustrated stereotypes not just of our town, but the towns we came from. Pick a statistic- teen pregnancy, infant mortality, alcohol, violence; or choose a privilege- good jobs and a dual income, free healthcare, quality education, access to finance and social mobility.

Of my father’s 7 siblings, 3 sisters would marry Maori men, and one a Samoan. His brothers married palagi women of Dutch, English and Spanish/Maori descent. My mother’s siblings married palagi and Maori too.

My twenty-three first cousins on both sides courted people of the Pacific – some of them married, and some married again. Their children are like sand now, countless grains coloured from quartz to obsidian, sparkling and intermingled.

When I first married, my wife was part palagi, part Maori, and her children (by coincidence) were red haired and freckled like I had been. They grew up fair skinned in brown South Auckland, amid the largest Polynesian and Maori populations in the country, and on the planet at the time – with growing communities from Asia and Africa.

I went to live in Samoa, the birthplace of my father for a short time, and I was not even considered afa-kasi (half-caste). I recognized, as others did, that I was a visitor.

I met a new partner, who had grown up in Tokelau and Samoa, a palagi raised in her early years in villages and on beaches where her skin was an exception.

The world is small, and people are many. In all nations, even those of the ocean, visitors have always come and gone, have loved, have stayed or left. 

There is an obligation upon a visitor to recognize their position and their host; and an obligation upon all to recognize that when someone stays in a place they cannot forever be a visitor; as attachments form there are responsibilities which ensue. 

It is important that cultures be retained, that stories are told, that languages and arts are shared so that they may be preserved - but culture, like land is weathered and reshaped by time and by people.

There is a tendency for people to seek to root their identity in a distinct ethnicity and culture. To anchor themselves, in a story and a place and people.

However, in this present, there is sometimes also an unrealistic, and uncharitable individuality expressed not as 'I am this' or 'my place is here'- but extended to ‘I am this, and you are that’, or ‘this is my story and it cannot be your story’. 

Such declarations are definition of oneself by exclusion, and often require the recognition of one ancestry, and a denial of others. 

We can recognize the past without repeating it, without denying that it is interwoven and that we are each different products of it all. A person can be descended (in fact is likely to be descended) from more than one side of any historical argument. 

To exclude me from your story or you from mine, is to separate our shores in the present, while neglecting the ocean between us.

My identity, and particularly my cultural and ethnic identity, is affected by those around me, but not reliant upon them. Like knowledge, or wisdom, my identity is not fixed, although it has roots. It ebbs and flows with time and exposure, it changes when I listen and when I speak to people, when I find stories and when I retell them, when I discover places and when I leave them. It is not dependent on the melanin in my skin or hair or eyes, but it does react to sun and rain and wind. It is hereditary, but it does not belong to those who came before me. It can be left or shared, but not taken,  by those around me.

My skin is creamy where it is covered, and mottled brown where it is not- the freckles move, sometimes they join. 

When I look at my family trees, I do not see lines- I see nets, woven strands that extend in several directions, crossing and recrossing- and they have snagged too many types of ancestor to count. Fish may school, but nets do not discriminate - for the ocean is large, and fish abound.

Birds cross great oceans, responding to the sun and the season. Coconuts float to follow the currents, and they take root where they land.

To see your heart, I must look past your skin;  to know your mind, I must listen to your voice; and to judge your intent I should observe your actions.

Sunday 24 April 2022

Nui Dat to Bridge Road

Dick is my mate Turtle's dad- or was, I'm not sure if he's still around.

I watched a movie last night about Australians in Vietnam, and it reminded me of being at Turtle's house when I was young. By that time Dick was single, divorced I think - raising Turtle and his elder sister Lara. Their house was a Mackay-special, two-story Queenslander of the type with weatherboards upstairs, and downstairs a concrete floored garage which had been walled in to accommodate a bar and a car- it was on Bridge Road opposite the end of our street, and a stone throw from the junior rugby league grounds. 

The house was clean, tidy and quiet. Upstairs was cool in the daytime, and the kitchen and living room were comfortably and simply furnished. The kids rooms were self-decorated, light and colourful by contrast. Nothing upstairs was out of place. The backyard was fenced, and the lawns front and back were always cut tidily, although I don't think I ever saw them being mowed- they just were.  

Dick had a record collection, I remember playing Bob Seger and the Silver Bullet Band. Near the record player there was military memorabilia in glass-fronted, faux-timber, china cabinets. I don't remember what exactly- maybe it included a picture of Dick in fatigues. According to Turtle, Dick was in Vietnam and was a member of the RAR, the Royal Australian Regiment. 

Dick was tall, and thin, and weathered - old to me, although he would have been my age now, between 40 and 50. He wore eye-glasses with smoke coloured lenses, not quite sunglasses inside and outside regardless of the light. Dick came to watch us play football and drank beer quietly. He spoke gently, definitively and rarely to adults and children alike. He may have been an alcoholic- but if drinking every day was that measure, so were most of the adults I knew. He came to football to watch us until Turtle stopped playing about the same time he started surfing, in high school. 

I went looking for Dick's service history last night for no other reason than I remembered him. I think I liked and respected him.

I found these photos posted by Dick, in the table on this page, there are 3 sets next to his name- almost 150 photos taken on operation: 9 RAR Association | Queensland Australia (9rarqld.org) 

They're not the kind of photos you might find from a passive deployment. 1968 was the deadliest year for the US allies in Vietnam, and it's when Dick and 9RAR arrived.
"Over the 12 months 9RAR took part in 11 major operations, each lasting roughly a month. These operations focused on pacification and reconnaissance, and aimed to isolate Viet Cong from the local population."  
9RAR is listed as having had 35 unit casualties, another 150 men were wounded.
One of Dick's last 'Nui Dat' pictures is the operations board for 9RAR- listing December '68 to November '69. Thirteen operations are listed- a couple more than the official record.

Dick's photos show the camp bar, skinny young men in greens holding beer. South Vietnamese crouching in tiger fatigues. Timber bunkers in the jungle. White men swimming on a beach. Aircraft- Chinooks, Hueys, a Caribou. Armoured personnel carriers and tanks, artillery. Pink and blue smoke grenades puffing in a clearing. Buffalo and wagons. A pretty young woman, in a white dress and a bamboo bonnet on a village street, the tip of the photographer's GP boot resting in the foreground on the edge of an armoured vehicle.

In Vietnam, 516 Australian soldiers died in these ways (official casualties are 521):
274 in battle
102 by mine
46 accidentally
44 'medical'
39 by friendly fire
11 murdered

300,0000 South Vietnamese died; and an estimated 1,100,000 North Vietnamese. (Roughly 2700 Vietnamese died for each Australian soldier killed.)

This interview with Dick was conducted on Anzac day 5 years ago. Dick was drinking at Harrup Park, the cricket club a block from the houses where we used to live: People don’t fight for their countries, they fight for their mates | The Courier Mail

Dick volunteered to for the army, although many did not. He would have been 24 years old, making him 4 years older than the average Australian soldier in Vietnam.

"From 1965 to 1972, over 15,300 national servicemen served in the Vietnam War, with 200 killed and 1,279 wounded."  Those 15,300 men conscripted were sent without choice. National service was later abolished in 1972 by Gough Whitlam's Labour, in response to public feeling about the Vietnam conflict.

These are comments from Australia's prime minister and opposition leader when Australia chose to engage in Vietnam:

“The Australian government is now in receipt of a request from the government of South Vietnam for further military assistance. We have decided, after close consultation with the government of the United States, to provide an infantry battalion for service in South Vietnam… The [communist] takeover of South Vietnam would be a direct military threat to Australia and all the countries of south and south-east Asia. It must be seen as a thrust by communist China between the Indian and Pacific Oceans.” - Robert Menzies, Australian prime minister, April 1965

“We do not think it [the deployment of Australian troops in Vietnam] a wise decision. We do not think it will help the fight against communism. We do not believe it will promote the welfare of the people of Vietnam.” - Arthur Calwell, Australian Labor Party leader, April 1965

“The Menzies government has made a reckless decision on Vietnam which this nation may live to regret. It has decided to send Australian soldiers into a savage, revolutionary war in which the Americans are grievously involved, so that America may shelve a tiny part of her embarrassment… It could be that our historians will recall this day with tears.” - The Australian newspaper, April 1965

The military sacrifices of the past can be honoured, at the same time as recognising the mistakes of the leadership which led to those sacrifices. It is not a contradiction to feel a deep sadness for those who suffered throughout and after those conflicts, and to be critical about the sheer waste of the exercise and its continuing repetition. Politicians and powerbrokers do not place themselves in harm's way when they launch rhetorical battle-cries; they are not the soldiers who will fight, nor are they the civilians who reside upon the battlegrounds. To those who would lament 'Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die': (Alfred, Lord Tennyson 1809-92): I say that you will know when you are fighting for your country, because you will be standing on it.

Remembrance does not need to be an acceptance that those sacrifices of the past were necessary, simply because they were made. Nor should it be an open criticism of those who served the will of others with honourable intent. Instead, it should force us to question not only the past, but the present, and make us consider our current choices and their motivations. Remembering helps us to recognise and engage with those we know and those whom we knew, who were marked by conflict, so that we might do better- for them and for the rest of us - lest we forget. 


Friday 15 April 2022

Fanua

Nafanua is a mythological Samoan warrior, a goddess born of a blood clot buried in the earth- her name translates literally as of the earth (fanua). In the legend she is triumphant in battle and her sex is only discovered when a breeze blows away her cloth to reveal her breasts, cowing the mean she had already defeated.

My great, great grandmother’s name was Fanua, and her life would tread the trail of her namesake Nafanua.

 Like her father of whom I have written, Seumanutafa, Fanua was adopted:

“Fanua’s father was Aisake Ainuu, a chief closely allied to the Malietoa family. He was one of the chiefs deported with King Malietoa Laupepa to Africa in the year 1887 by the Germans…when Fanua was a few years old she was adopted (after the Samoan custom of exchange by adoption of the children of chiefs) by Seumanutafa, chief of Apia in Upolu and from that time has been recognized as his daughter”  

The mention of Aisake Ainuu’s deportation is ironic and prescient- given that on December 21, 1926 Fanua would leave Samoa with her husband, Judge Edwin Gurr, deported from Samoa for five years, this time for supporting the Mau against NZ administration. I must admit to a rush of pride at the deportation of not one, but (at least) two forebears who displayed so openly- what my 10th grade English teacher would later describe as- “a problem with authority figures”.

Before then, in 1888 at the age of 16, Fanua was titled the Taupou of Apia.

Between 1887 and 1894 a complex bout of civil wars, centered in Apia, took place for leadership of Samoa and consolidation of the four major high chiefly titles with three contestants to the throne- each backed by the self-interested colonial powers of Germany, USA and Great Britain, with varying degrees of commitment to arbitrary destruction. (In fact there are and were five significant titles, but four titles were held amid the three prospects vying for rule).

Within this 7 year maelstrom- Seumanutafa fought on the side of the Malietoa (another title to which there were two claimants… I know, you could write a book about it- in fact, someone did, he’s coming up); anyway, Fanua enthusiastically engaged in the conflict, transporting supplies of food and weapons and attending the trenches, shelters and encampments littering the land around Apia; presenting a moving target amid the various battles, ambushes and raids; “she had on many occasions exhibited much coolness, presence of mind and bravery in danger and trouble.” In 1889 a natural event would stall the wars briefly, when a great hurricane destroyed 6 warships in Apia harbour and killed over 150 men. That storm would have killed many more if not for Samoan saviours including Fanua and her father. Fanua coordinated much of the recovery of the rescued soldiers and was presented a personal gift by Admiral Kimberly of the US Navy for her work.

In a later incident, toward the end of the wars, supporters of Mata'afa occupied the home of Fanua and Judge Gurr, because they advocated for the opposing claimant of the Malietoa title. The Judge possessed papers and items considered valuable to both sides. There were also a uniform and sword significant to the Malietoa. When these were unable to be recovered by other means, Fanua boldly approached the occupiers, led by Aliipia, and requested she be allowed to gather some of her things, including the Judge’s papers and typewriter. Aliipia graciously allowed her to, and Fanua then requested of the warriors there, “Will any of you young chiefs carry these things to town for me?” Only after the goods had been safely removed to the waterfront with the sword and uniform of the Malietoa secreted among them, and stowed in a boat waiting; did Fanua deign to tip-off her enemy-porters. “Do you know what you have brought down? You have carried the uniform and the sword of the Malietoa”. You can imagine the bunch of chagrinned warriors in their prime debating among themselves whether to run back up the hill to tell the boss the lady had duped them...

Fanua married Judge Gurr on December 31st, 1890. They had two children, their son Bernard and daughter, Teuila. The wedding was attended by anyone who was anyone- which at the time tended to include the available admiralty and occupiers, and renowned author and man-about-Vailima, Tusitala aka Robert Louis Stevenson... (if you want to know more about the civil wars- ‘A Footnote to History’ is RLS’s observational if biased interpretation as local papalagi fictional correspondent.) 

 As Judge Gurr recalled:

“Robert Louis Stevenson and Fanua Eleitino Gurr were great friends from the time of their first meeting till his death, and even unto the time of her death in December 1917 she frequently spoke most lovingly of Mr Stevenson and all the members of his talented family.”

“She was a frequent guest of Vailima. Sometimes for several months at a stretch Fanua and her husband were favored guests of the family and occupied Tusitala's Library.”

Stephenson’s mother, Mrs Margaret Stephenson gave Fanua lessons in English and RLS also chose the name of Fanua’s daughter, my great grandmother, Teuila. 

“I believe that Fanua played against Tusitala in his last game of tennis. I had arrived at Vailima from my office in Apia just before dusk of one of the days when we were stopping at Vailima. Tusitala had been playing rather more vigorously than usual in order to extinguish the 'Aitu.' The game was drawing to a close when Mr Stevenson was compelled to cease playing owing to a hemorrhage starting. Mrs Stevenson then insisted that he should not play tennis any more, and I believe this was his last game, a few months before his death.”

In referring to ‘extinguishing the Aitu’- Gurr was using a pet name that RLS and his family used for Fanua: “Fanua was also styled on many other occasions by Mr Stevenson as ' Le Aitu ' which designates a visitor from the spirit world.“  It seems an appropriate term- aitu- for a warrior, a witch, and a wonder. Not other worldly, but of this place, fanua or whenua. They meant it with love.

This blog is dedicated to my first cousin, goddess and warrior- Richelle Kahui-McConnell, who carried and shared the spirit of Nafanua and Fanua, all the way to the whenua

Amuia le masina, e alu ma toe sau... alofa tele.

https://www.rejectedprincesses.com/princesses/nafanua

https://samoanmythology.net/ts-nafanua-goddess-of-war/

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SAMZ19180209.2.18?query=Regent

https://www.ebooksread.com/authors-eng/rosaline-orme-masson/i-can-remember-robert-louis-stevenson-hci/page-23-i-can-remember-robert-louis-stevenson-hci.shtml

  

Sunday 6 June 2021

O le fale oe le Fe’e : the house of the Octopus.


"I'd like to be, under the sea, in an octopus' garden in the shade.
He'd let us in, knows where we've been, in his octopus' garden in the shade.
I'd ask my friends to come and see an octopus' garden with me" - The Beatles



In oral history, the Seumanutafa lineage can be traced back to le Fe'e- literally the octopus. In the early 1890’s, Reverend John Stair, and British Consul John Williams hiked from Apia to the ruins of a temple, known as the ‘Fale o Fe’e’ or Temple of the Octopus. The short story below combines the legend recounted by Williams, and the walk journaled by Stair.

 

O le fale oe le Fe’e : the house of the Octopus.

‘Do you mean an animal- a real octopus... or a man who was like an octopus?’ the priest asked. ‘Where did it come from?’

‘O le Fe’e na sau mai Fiti.’ murmured the brown man, crouching to sit on a large flat-topped stone.

‘The Octopus came out of Fiji... an aitu,’ Williams translated, without being asked.

‘Aitu?’ the priest again.

‘A spirit,’ Williams went on.

‘A demon?’ furthered the priest.

‘Probably not- neither good nor bad’ Williams countered patiently.

‘Sometimes an animal… perhaps a man’ the old man went on. Williams translated softly.

The priest watched the old man’s eyes twinkle and wondered at his age. He could have been anywhere between thirty and seventy- his eyes were bright but narrowed by the sun and his close cropped hair was black. His stomach was flat and the tendons in his timber coloured forearms rippled gently below the skin, though he held his machete loosely.    

‘…maybe he was a man like an octopus, or an octopus like a man… maybe he had many hands or he moved as though he had many hands…,’, the old man continued. ‘Perhaps he could change himself, and become like the stones and the coral, to hide... or to watch’.

The priest looked around the clearing they sat in, at the large, crumbling blocks of white stone- seemingly frozen in the act of tumbling to the grass. They were collectively disorganised, and yet unmistakeably placed in a rough circle, stacked in places. He and Williams had already walked more than a day from the ocean. Cut coral blocks could not get here easily- no man would be able to carry them alone. Several thick wooden poles still stood, mossy and branchless within the broken block walls.

The old man talked on: ‘When he came, first he came near to Apia, he rested a little while on the beach. But it did not suit him, perhaps there were already aitu there, or too many people, but he left the sea. He must have followed the river… he could not be too far from water.’

The priest sympathised. The walk up had been through thick, green jungle, made more dense by the oppressive humidity. His ankles and calves ached from balancing, as they had marched over uneven lava boulders lining the river which they had followed up the valley. He congratulated himself again on not yet having removed his jacket and tie- no small concession to the heat and atmosphere. He had already consumed a pint or more of water, and he was no octopus.

‘He lived first in a cave,’ the old man stated, as though his conviction were rising.

‘There’s plenty around.’ Williams waved vaguely at the surrounding basalt stone cliffs, peeking from the jungle below the mountainous spurs.

‘To build his home- he must have had help- many aitu came.’

‘Bloody plenty of them’ thought the priest… ‘there’s a spirit for morning, noon and night every day of the week- for every battle and cause.’ The priest had already experienced great difficulty in trying to convince people there could be only one God. They laughed at the thought. ‘Your one God would be too busy’ one prospect had commented seriously. ‘To watch over my brother fishing, and my children playing, and my wife working and to still be with me when I call on him to help me gamble.’

The old man had settled into his story now, and carried on without prompting. ‘One day, before his house was finished, some women came to bathe in the river nearby. One was heavily pregnant… when the time came, she cried out in pain. The baby did not come quickly.’

‘The aitu who were helping the fe’e to build his home heard her cries and they fled the noise. The fe’e followed up the mountain.‘

A rumble rolled up the valley and Williams looked up at the sky, to see it bruised, grey and purple toward the harbour they had come from. Rain was coming, and they would not be able to stay much longer.

‘For a time the fe’e waited’ the old man stared out at the rising storm above the ocean. ‘But eventually, he became impatient and he grumbled.’

‘He had a found a perfect place for a home, and had even begun to build it, now he wanted to return to it. The fe’e sent an aitu as a messenger to the village that the women had come from. It is near here.’

‘The fe’e said tell them “I will go to the place where I was before. I will be the matua of the land and their sign in all things. I will return to my home.”’

‘He came back?’ asked the Priest, turning as a small stream of dust and pebbles tricked from the nearest blocks. Nothing else moved. The jungle, noisy and bustling with birds on the hike up, was now still and silent.

Ioe

‘An agreement was made’ added Williams. ‘Now the villages in this region use the Octopus as an emblem, a symbol for their warriors and canoes.’

Faititili o le fe'e tautala‘ ended the old man, standing and tapping his machete on a stone as he gazed out at the skyline.  O le taimi nei e alu

‘Faititili? Thunder’ guessed the priest. ‘Is he afraid?’

‘Perhaps... but not of the weather. It’s time to go’ Williams stood up and looked around the clearing for the porters. He pretended not to notice a thick green vine retracting, disappearing behind one of the nearby stones.

 

This story has been adapted from the sources below:

'A SAMOAN LEGEND'- presumed by J. C. Williams, Esq., the British Consul at Apia

“O LE FALE-O-LE-FE'E”: OR, RUINS OF AN OLD SAMOAN TEMPLE by Rev John B Stair

Monday 31 May 2021

Seumanutafa Moepogai and the storm of 1889

I wrote here a long time ago, about Judge Gurr and Fanua, and their deportation from Samoa in 1927, for their opposition to New Zealand governance of Samoa. That blog mentioned Fanua’s father, Seumanutafa Moepogai*; my great, great, great grandfather.

Seumanutafa lived between 1852-1918, 66 volatile years in which modern Samoa would begin to be forged. A blog is an inadequate biography - what follows is simply one story.

Seumanutafa Moepogai was born ‘Talalelei’, in 1852 and he was renamed after being adopted from his wider family. Adoption is, and was, common in his society- once adopted and renamed, there remained no question of identity or place in his aiga (one could hold one place in a family or many simultaneously). His daughter Fanua herself would also be adopted by Seumanutafa and his wife, Faatulia.

Seumanutafa is described in several historical records, and by Robert Louis Stephenson, as ‘Chief’ of Apia- and although it may be an incomplete translation of his position, it indicates his status:

“I have been once down to Apia, to a huge native feast at Seumanutafa’s, the chief of Apia.” Wrote RLS; later describing a photograph of the 3 of them: “Seumanu…is chief of Apia, a rather big gun in this place, looking like a large, fatted, military Englishman, bar the colour.  Faatulia, next me, is a bigger chief than her husband.”  (1891)

The respect between the Seumanutafa and Steveson families, was obviously reciprocated as Stevenson recalled: “Seumanu gave me one of his names; and when my name was called at the ava drinking, behold, it was Au mai taua ma manu-vao!  You would scarce recognise me, if you heard me thus referred to!”

In the 1880s, Seumanutafa’s Apia was the central battleground for more than one civil war - the flames of which were stoked by Germany, the USA and Britain wrestling for colonial influence.

War for supremacy or control was not new to Samoa. For three millennia prior, Samoan rule had paradoxically been both divided and bound by titles. Power shifted according to the rivals of the day- it was not fixed in a single title; dynasties waxed and waned as power was attained or lost in battle, or built and consolidated through trade, negotiation and relationships. By Seumanutafa’s time, Samoa had four recognised ‘paramount’ titles.

However, in the colonial Pacific, it was inconvenient for palagi to deal with multiple regional leaders (least of all those that felt an obligation to make decisions through a complex democratic system of nu’u fono ma le matai- village meetings and representatives). For colonisers, a single ruler was needed, to negotiate - or preferrably not - on behalf of the ‘nation’. The ensuing Samoan wars to claim and consolidate titles were brutal.

However, one deciding event in the wars, and the one for which Seumanutafa would be well remembered was determined not in battle- but by nature, when on March 15, 1889 a great cyclone struck Apia harbour.

At the time, Britain, America and Germany all had warships in Apia harbour, providing military support, arms and occasionally indiscriminate airborne shelling - in support of their chosen champions.

When the cyclone struck however, the proverbial tide turned. According to US Rear-AdmiralL.A. Kimberly, in his report:

“SIR: It becomes my painful duty to report to the Department the disastrous injury and loss sustained by the vessels under my command in the harbor of Apia during the hurricane which swept these waters March 15 and 16.

When the gale commenced there were in the harbor the following men of war: U.S. ships Trenton, Vandalia, and Nipsic; H[er].B[rittanic].M[ajesty's]. ship Calliope, and H[is].I[mperial].G[ermanic].M[ajesty's]. ships Addler, Olga, and Eber...”

Within those two days, 6 warships- 3 German and 3 American- were beached or wrecked and almost 150 of their crewmen dead.

What is most remarkable though, is that more palagi lives would have been lost- had not the Samoans leapt into the deadly sea to save their antagonists. Seumanutafa led the rescue.

Rear-Admiral L.A. Kimberly again: “Seumanutafa, chief of Apia, and Selu Leauanae did excellent service in saving life, and took the lead in directing the work of the natives. They organized boats' crews and carried out the suggestions of the offices. Seumanutafa took charge of and steered the boat which was the first to carry lines to the wreck in the early morning of the 17th, while it was yet dark, and the passage across the reef and approach to the Trenton was beset with difficulty and danger”

The actions and courage of the Samoans were undeniably heroic:  

“The natives in the surf, under the direction of two of their chiefs, Seumanu Tafa and Salu Anae, had succeeded in getting lines to the vessels, and double hawsers were quickly stretched to the shore. Scores of eager hands were outstretched to assist in the work. The waves broke high on the beach, and the undertow was so strong that even the natives narrowly escaped being carried out into the bay. The white men on shore scarcely dared venture into the surf. The rain poured more heavily. The clouds of flying sand grew thicker and more…

To one who saw the noble work of those men during the storm, it is a cause of wonder that they should be called savages by more enlightened races. There seemed to be no instinct of the savage in a man who could rush into that boiling torrent of water that broke upon the reef, and place his own life in peril to save the helpless drowning men of a foreign country.”-  A.H.Godbey A.M. 1890

The sheer scale of the loss gave pause to the German and American fleets- but it would be another decade before the 3 foreign powers would settle their disputes formally, in the tripartite agreement of 1899 (which would be drafted by Seumanutafa’s son-in-law Judge Gurr)- separating American Samoa from German Samoa.

Seumanutafa lived on to see the arrival of the New Zealand expeditionary force which took power from Germany in 1914, without a shot fired. The Kiwis included a young former customs clerk from Wellington who would become his grandson-in-law, Lloyd Halliday.

In 1918 Seumanutafa fell finally to the influenza epidemic brought by the Talune, along with almost a quarter of his countrymen and women- but that’s another story.

 I wish to offer my sincere thanks to the Seumanutafa aiga for keeping and sharing your stories. I have borrowed from them to tell this brief story, and I do so with respect and love.  Fa’afetai tele lava.

*Records from the time refer variously to Seumanu, Seumanu Tafa, and Seumanutafa Pogai- based on photographs and events, and references to his family, I must presume these refer to the same man.

Friday 7 June 2019

The Ministry of Truth


‘Who controls the past controls the future, who controls the present controls the past’- 1984, George Orwell.

‘Believe nothing you hear, and only half of what you see” -Edgar Allan Poe

“Unless I see the nail marks in his hands, and put my fingers where the nails were, and put my hand in his side, I will not believe” - Thomas, the apostle (John 20:25)

It’s less than 10 years since David Roberts coined the term ‘post-truth era’… or maybe it’s more than 10 years and it was Steve Teisch… post-truth, alternative facts and similarly counter-intuitive terms, have entered common usage while some of the world appears to have moved to a common acceptance that the truth is not only subjective, it may be unimportant, it is inevitably inconvenient and apparently, something of the past. 

As Julius Caesar burned the great library of Alexandria, the greatest collection of recorded knowledge on the flat map of the time, he may have wondered what use is there in gathering the knowledge of the world if a flame can obliterate it… and shortly thereafter, if a scribe might create a new and more convenient version of the past?

We now have the wits of the world at the touch of a button- but it’s worth is considerably diminished because that information can be subverted, denied or simply outweighed by a number of unreliable and sometimes indistinguishable sources at the touch of another button.

Orwell aptly described the process by which the victor not only writes history, but once in power can consistently rewrite it to suit their changing needs. In 1984, the Ministry of Truth issues the news of the day couched in terms of a fluidly changing history which makes sense of the present, to appease and control the reader- new wars are not begun, they are perpetuated; new alliances not struck, the parties have always been loyal. The Ministry of Truth prints the lies needed to support the current belief.

That distribution of a manipulative message to support and develop a particular set of beliefs, we sometimes call propaganda. That word literally comes from the propagation of the church's message by the cardinal members. It is unsurprising then that the same church which invented propaganda in the 17th century, is the one which deems the opposing team- the dark forces of this world- to be led by the ‘father of lies’. While ‘propaganda’ was the term used by one side of the political world to describe campaigns of misinformation in opposing states- it’s pertinent to remember that the word belongs to the team which governs the democratic side of the equation, while declaring all other forms of government as unequal, unfair, and untenable.

Where am I going with this?

Misinformation, propaganda and lies are not new… and they’re not the tools of the enemy. Nor is the truth old news. It is fixed in reality. However, after the event, as history, truth is prey to those in power. That’s important, because if the truth changes, the past changes- and our acceptance of what is and is not acceptable as a society, changes.

Our access to information is so broad as to appear infinite, but the sources of information within that scope are factionalised, sometimes constrained and always open to influence. This is also not new.

While I detest the opinionated filters of news and commentary across the political spectrum, I can tolerate the range. I can sift the scat to weigh and measure the falsities and facts, and seek a truth of a kind.

There are things happening in the world now, which are acceptable and were not in the past. Some of these things are simply the nature of passing time. However, some of the messages being promulgated by our leaders today are a distortion of the truth, based upon a distortion of history which supports actions outside the moral scope of those which we- or at least I- had previously agreed as a part of a civilised society.

Right now, there are movements in some political spheres which aim not just to deceive- to provide misinformation or propaganda supporting one side of an argument- but to absolutely discredit and then remove the other side of the argument. To remove the opportunity for opposition or dissent.

If we allow the sources from which we seek information to be reduced, threatened or manipulated- if we depend too heavily on some sources and not others- then the ways in which we access and filter our truth must diminish and become vulnerable to the control of those who desire it.

Over the past few years particular people in positions of power have discredited news providers and journalists globally in order to reduce credibility of their critics- criticisms often earned by fragrant disregard for decency and law.

I watched this week what appeared to be a government endorsed act of intimidation on their own public broadcaster, in a country of which I am a citizen. The types of criticism normally levelled at non-democratic states for media censorship were validly directed toward the Australian government. It isn't new- it is part of a pattern of government behaviour over a decade involving progressive changes to media laws, to structures and funding, and documented incidents of interference, with the aim of manipulating public perception, concealing ethically questionable behaviour, and curbing criticism and debate.

When asked this week for a reaction to federal police raids on media organisations, raids with the stated aim of identifying ‘whistle-blowing’ media sources, the prime minister of Australia responded, “It never troubles me that our laws are being upheld”.

On the contrary- when the media is being attacked using civil institutions, for exposing breaches of law committed on behalf of our government; and when our laws themselves are being amended to allow fundamental perversions of justice- then we should all be troubled.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-11/killings-of-unarmed-afghans-by-australian-special-forces/8466642



Friday 24 August 2018

Sunsets

“Maybe I should drop by, maybe I should have called
Maybe I should have followed you and beat down your door
Maybe it's gonna be breaking you every time you fall
But to shower you with pity will do you no good at all, no good at all” 

- Powderfinger ‘Sunsets’


Anguish and despair are not mental illnesses. They’re emotions.

The term ‘suicide epidemic’ is playing heavily in the international and local media. 'Depression’, ‘mental illness’, ‘demons’ and ‘darkness’ are to blame we’re told.

They mean that no-one in their right mind checks out. We’re meant to shuffle off this mortal coil, not leap and certainly not stroll.

There is a danger in the classification of suicide as a symptom of illness, which lies in the inability to distinguish rational despair.

Listening, empathy, and understanding- regularly held up to be a part of the ‘solution’ to ‘mental illness’- require that we understand that sadness is not necessarily illogical, and an individual may choose in their right mind to not continue living.

The euthanasia debate in this nation and others often hinges- as will the legislation- on the terminality of illness, and the competency of a person seeking to consent to end their own life.

In other words, it’s ok if you’re going to die anyway. Well, who isn’t?

In a world with increasing pressures of population, of rising intolerance, and where the gap between ‘have’ and ‘have not’ is not just widening- but is increasingly accepted, it requires a set of rigid personal mental filters not to despair... for others or yourself, for your family or your values, for your home or for the planet – or simply for the loss of shared compassion once described as ‘humanity’. 

Social media feeds and other everyday influencers strain with self-help and creak with conviction, pissing positivity in great rainbow showers, meant to balance the obvious and immediate reality of a world that has some very serious problems, all of which are ours.

If you accept that- and you may not- then it’s possible to look at the described ‘suicide epidemic’ not as a rash of mental instability spreading from an unknown source- but as a rational reaction by a species to overpopulation.

Sometimes, the problems are more immediate and personal- but that simply demonstrates the rationale.

“On May 28, 2014, Robin was finally given an explanation for the tangled lattice of sicknesses that had been plaguing him. He was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease"- excerpted from 'Robin' by Dave Itzkoff.

In August the same year, Robin Williams would commit suicide.

After a life of 63 years Robin was contemplating a painful death and mental decline. However, for some reason, reports on his death needed to include ‘lifelong battles’ with depression, alcohol and drug use, as though they were cause. Frankly, if every comedian with depressive tendencies or who liked a tipple were to commit suicide, well, there wouldn’t be any jokes in the eulogies… These factors are not irrelevant to Robin’s life- but neither does his choice of death seem unreasoned if we simply consider the immediate circumstances and his perspective, without accumulating a log of every drink or sad smile over his lifetime.

When a 26-year-old Iranian refugee died in June 2018 on the island of Nauru, he became the twelfth person to die in Australian offshore detention and the fifth asylum seeker to die on Nauru. He had at that point been detained for 5 years.

Call it depression if you like- but I don’t think there is anything irrational in the viewpoint that the man’s case could plausibly be described as pretty fucking hopeless. Debate the immigration policy amongst yourselves- but I’m unsure why it was necessary for media coverage to imply it was a death due to mental illness? Broken, distraught, hopeless- yes.

Sometimes, we simply refuse to listen when something could not be said more clearly…When prominent gay rights lawyer David Buckel set himself on fire in a park in Brooklyn in 2018, he left a suicide note. He intended for his death to make a statement about protecting the environment.

"I struggle to believe that this is a protest suicide. I think that, underneath, he's got to be in a very dark place, it's not characteristic of David"- said a friend.

I agree that it is by nature and definition, very uncharacterisitic. It’s a bit of a one time show. Not every communication requires interpretation. He wrote down his reason. Why would we not believe someone who has gone to the extreme to deliver what is in essence a simple message? Is it easier to ignore what’s said- undermine it- to class it as a form of insanity?

"Why don't the newscasters cry when they read about people who die? At least they could be decent enough to put just a tear in their eye..." sang Jack Johnson.

In New Zealand this week they did cry, when one of their colleagues, Greg Boyed, 'died suddenly'. He had "...battled depression for years before his death." we were told- instantly upon news of his death.

"How to tackle New Zealand's depression crisis" rang head lines. "A common misconception is that depression is an extreme form of sadness whereas the reality is absence of emotion. It is a deep void of an oppressive nothingness that sucks all pleasure out of living." Really? Fuck!

That seems quite a leap to take instantly. He's dead. He must've been sick. In the head...
Or it is possible that there is a bunch of stuff we don't know about the dead and successful newscaster.
"Why don't the newscasters cry when they read about people who die?"

“Most people who attempt suicide don’t want to die – they just want their pain to end or can't see another way out of their situation.” - opening line of the Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand website.

I am not saying that suicide and mental health are not significant issues. 

What I am saying is that they are not the same issue

If we fail to recognize that there are real reasons for despair, and instead continue to address suicide as a flaw in the health of the individual, then the genuine and startlingly obvious problems, the circumstances which sometimes leave people without hope will remain unaddressed- and suicide with them, as a very natural response.